Johnson and Johnson marketed baby powder for decades as a safe and gentle household product. However, the product now sits at the center of one of the largest product liability litigations in United States history. Public court records show that over 60,000 individuals have filed lawsuits alleging that long term use of talcum powder products contributed to serious cancers. Most of these claims focus on ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.
How Many Victims Have Come Forward
According to federal court filings and publicly reported litigation data, over 60,000 plaintiffs have brought talcum powder related claims against Johnson and Johnson in the United States alone. As a result of the volume and similarity of claims, courts have consolidated these cases into large scale mass tort proceedings to manage pretrial issues more efficiently.
Importantly, this number represents individuals and families who allege harm. It does not reflect final outcomes. Instead, it demonstrates the scope and national impact of the litigation.
Billions Paid and Proposed in Talc Litigation
Over the past several years, juries across multiple states have awarded multi billion dollar verdicts in talcum powder cancer cases. In response to the growing number of claims, Johnson and Johnson has also publicly proposed a global settlement reported at approximately $6.5 billion to resolve tens of thousands of ovarian cancer lawsuits.
These figures come directly from court decisions, bankruptcy filings, and disclosures made by the company itself. Additionally, some verdicts have been reduced or appealed, which commonly occurs in large product liability cases.
Cancers Linked to Talcum Powder Claims
The lawsuits primarily involve two serious diagnoses.
Ovarian cancer claims allege that long term perineal use of talcum powder allowed talc particles to migrate internally over time.
Mesothelioma claims allege asbestos exposure from contaminated talc products, even in individuals without industrial asbestos exposure. As a result, both claims rely on medical records, exposure history, and expert testimony presented in court.
Why These Lawsuits Exist
Evidence introduced during litigation includes internal company documents, laboratory testing, and expert analysis. Plaintiffs allege that Johnson and Johnson knew about contamination risks associated with talc but failed to adequately warn consumers. Consequently, multiple juries have agreed that consumers were not properly informed.
Who May Still Have a Claim
You may want to explore your legal options if you regularly used Johnson and Johnson baby powder and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma. Additionally, families may have claims if a loved one passed away after long term talc exposure. Importantly, many cases involve exposure that occurred decades before diagnosis.
Legal Representation and Ongoing Cases
Mass tort and civil rights attorney Ben Crump is publicly handling talcum powder cancer cases and representing individuals who allege harm caused by corporate misconduct.
More information about the litigation is available directly through his firm here
https://bencrump.com/class-action-lawyer/talcum-powder-cancer/
Why This Reporting Matters
Cancer treatment, loss of income, and long term care often place enormous strain on families. Therefore, these lawsuits focus not only on compensation but also on accountability, transparency, and consumer safety.
Independent journalism plays a critical role because it helps the public understand what courts are examining and why these cases matter.
⚠️ This is independent journalism funded by the people for the people.
Legal and Medical Disclaimer:
This content is for informational and journalistic purposes only. It does not constitute legal or medical advice. Outcomes vary. Consult qualified professionals regarding your specific situation.
